LA: Bill Would Require Repeat “Johns” to Register as Sex Offender in Louisiana

Source: redriverradio.org 2/21/25

Shreveport State Representative Steven Jackson pre-filed a bill ahead of the 2025 Regular Legislative Session that would require anyone convicted more than once for solicitation of prostitution to register as a sex offender.

State Representative Steven Jackson, D-Shreveport, is sending a message to those who are convicted of solicitation of prostitution that repeat offenders, so-called “johns,” should face tougher penalties. Rep. Jackson pre-filed a bill this week [ahead of the April 14 start date] for the 2025 Regular Legislative Session that would require anyone convicted more than once for solicitation of prostitution to register as a sex offender.

The current punishment, spelled out in Louisiana’s criminal code [RS 14:83], calls for a maximum fine of $750 and/or a six-month jail sentence. Jackson’s House Bill 5 would also maintain the increased punishment for repeat solicitation convictions, which includes a maximum possible fine of $2,000 and/or one year behind bars. Jackson described his reasoning for adding the sex offender registration requirement for repeat offenders. “It’s just merely a misdemeanor. And so, maybe people will think twice if they have to register as a sex offender as a more serious crime.”

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Let’s welcome the crowds of sex workers and elderly widowers soon to be joining our club.

Why should Johns think twice if they’d have to register? It’s not like it’s punitive or anything.

“It’s just merely a misdemeanor. And so, maybe people will think twice if they have to register…” Oh, o.k. Now I see. It isn’t punishment…………

Last edited 1 month ago by Way too long

Jackson described his reasoning for adding the registration requirement for people who commit a repeat sex offense. “It’s just merely a misdemeanor. And so, maybe people will think twice if they have to register…”

I sworn you guys said the registry was a tool for parents to keep their kiddies safe. Not for people to “think twice” before they commit a crime. You basically admitted the registry is a deterrent to crime. In other words, it’s punishment, because it’s the punishment of being on a registry that deters.

This is actually a good article written and the forum should take the time to read as it gives the punishments to the PFR of a sex conviction in addition to given other data associated with a sex conviction/registration.

As for Northern LA where the bill originates from, it is Northern LA…who wants to solicit there and why is this gent worried about it? Preparing for his next election campaign?

They’re admitting the registry is punishment. The “public safety” argument falls apart under scrutiny and closer examination. Politicians are telling on themselves every time a “registerable offense” is added.

So so so much to work with! I’ll leave the rest to others… but….

Where are all the victims? 10’s of millions of men have solicited 2 or more times over the course of their lifetime. So, if all of them are genuinely F&H RIsks…

Where are their hundreds of millions of victims, and how does nobody notice what these guys are up to? Millions upon millions of F&H “Events” every single year for… well in this case for the last, forever…. nobody notices anything, and nothing gets reported?

How is that possible? Also, if this is what is happening, and this is what has been happening for several thousand years, is it really a problem? Seems to me, that given the volume involved, and for how long…. with no reporting….whatever the results of these guys’s behaviors are just accepted as a normal part of life?

If not, why no reports?

Politicians don’t get caught because they get expensive escorts, take them on “ vacations” and bill it all to taxpayers. Or just go out of the country so the Feds can’t bust them. If I remember, a politician was buying underage girls for sex, but since it was in South America, he didn’t face any legal issues in U.S. This happened maybe 12 yrs ago.

According to that map, I find it odd that Hawaii doesn’t have any restrictions on where a person on the registry can live, yet they have a 1,000 ft restriction on where they can work near a school, park or daycare. That basically excludes most jobs since everything is packed together in Hawaii—particularly Honolulu. It’s like the state is fine with a registered person being unemployed and homeless on the street

Last edited 1 month ago by Jax

its the lords work in LA , back to mid evil days. so a fat guy or ugly guy that is sexual deprived in life anyways we all have needs. a little emoitional maybe a conversation a companion which is very hard for some. rejection is a human feeling, hooking up is a way help men like us to feel wanted again stop the insanity

Last edited 30 days ago by bruce w